‘Popular Sebab Drama Baru Keluar, Feeling Hero Pujaan’ – Penerbit Selar ‘Artis Terkejut Popular?’
Sumber : Ohbulan
Personal Injury Lawer
A Philadelphia lawyer isn’t done litigating false advertising cases against law firms, though he wasn’t able to persuade a federal judge last month that Larry Pitt & Associates was entitled to damages for a rival Philadelphia firm’s ad claims.
Lawyer Maurice Mitts told the Legal Intelligencer he wasn’t ready to say whether the Pitt firm would appeal the Feb. 15 decision, which criticized the defendant law firm, Lundy Law, despite ruling on its behalf.
But there is a second case waiting in the wings: a false advertising suit against Morgan & Morgan. Mitts represents the plaintiff law firm, Rosenbaum & Associates, which recently filed an amended complaint with added details from discovery. The initial suit alleged that Morgan & Morgan leads consumers to believe the firm actively litigates cases in Pennsylvania even though it has just one Philadelphia lawyer with little personal injury experience
In the suit against Lundy Law, U.S. District Judge Cynthia Rufe said Larry Pitt & Associates couldn’t recover damages “despite evidence of years of wrongdoing” by Lundy Law. The law firm had referred disability benefits cases to outside law firms even as it promised potential clients it would help them through the process, according to the judge.
Rufe said the false advertising claim fails because the Pitt firm hadn’t proved any clients were influenced by the ads, report Law360 and a prior story by the Legal Intelligencer. She also noted that Lundy Law had changed its practices, eroding its claim of a likelihood of future violations that could provide the basis for an injunction.
